Sentinel Absence: Predictions for the US (Trump administration)'s response to the NATO Article 4 crisis and its strategic consequences

Chapter 1: Executive Summary

1.1. Bottom Line Up Front (Conclusion)

The Donald Trump administration will respond to Poland's invocation of Article 4 of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) based on President Trump's individual transactional worldview, rather than on the view of treaty obligations or solidarity of alliances. The most accurate (65-75%) result is \ None "Transactional Pivot"\ None It is. That is, the US will withhold meaningful military support for NATO's "Operation Eastern Sentinel," and instead use the crisis as a bargaining material to elicit concessions from European allies on defense spending costs and trade policy against China. This action will create a serious crises of trust within NATO, harboring Russia and giving China a strategic opportunity, regardless of the outcome of immediate crisis management at the Polish border.

1.2. Request for immediate action (main recommendations)

• diplomatic: Any European response to US demands will be immediately redefine as a "new partnership on fair shares" to give President Trump a public "winning" and ease his punitive impulses. Public and direct conflict with the White House should be avoided.

• 軍事: With the assumption that the US does not participate, the European-led "Operation Eastern Sentinel" will be fully invested in resources as a virtually independent security mechanism and made operational. Sharing integrated air defense and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) will be our number one priority.

• Strategic Communication: It launches a collaborative information campaign targeting major US congressional officials and conservative media, with the argument that a robust, unified NATO is the core "America First" interest that will contain Russia at a low cost.

1.3. Top risk

• Alliance Cracks (High Risk): The US transactional response could functionally double layer NATO, and could encourage a de facto collapse of the collective defense regime and Russia's miscalculation.

• Russia's Escalation (Medium Risk): US non-involvement could be interpreted by Russia as effectively raising the threshold for Article 5 activation, and could be the green light for even more aggressive hybrid attacks on the NATO eastern flank.

• Inter-Atlantic trade war (medium risk): If President Trump's demands are not met, he could implement punitive tariff threats against the European Union, leading to the development of a security crisis into an economic crisis.

Chapter 2: Trump Doctrine in Crisis: A Prediction Framework

2.1. Psychological Engine: Narratives of grudge, retaliation, and "awareness of hijacked victims"

To build a core analytical framework that underpins all future forecasts, it is essential to understand that President Trump's actions are based on predictable and consistent logic rather than contingent. His foreign policy is driven by a deep-rooted victim-conscious narrative that the United States has been historically exploited by unfair alliances and trade agreements 1. Poland's request to impose Article 4 is not interpreted in Washington as a security threat, but as an event that triggers this narrative of grudge, namely, in which an allied state "requests" for US protection.

This analysis is based on the "Trump Justice" framework. This framework forms a self-enhancing feedback loop. First, a fundamental sense of grudge lays the foundation for doubt. Next, when an external event (in this case, a request for Article 4) occurs, it is interpreted as a personal and national insult. The required response is not a negotiation seen as a sign of weakness, but a dominant action to "win" - a transactional request 1. This "hijacked victim awareness" strategy allows punitive actions (such as withholding support and threats to tariffs) to be positioned as legitimate retaliation against unfair exploiters 1. President Trump's publicity as the "whiner" shows that he uses his expression of dissatisfaction as a deliberate strategy to obtain the desired outcome.

2.2. Transactional Toolkit: treating alliances as contracts and security as a product

President Trump's business career directly shapes his approach to international relations. In particular, there is a prominent tendency to view alliances and treaties as negotiable commercial contracts rather than binding pledges. His business's six-time application for Section 11 of the Bankruptcy Code has instilled him a high degree of resistance to strategically defaulting on his obligations 1. Just as he was able to use his legality to protect his personal assets and escape debt, he uses the international framework to dismantle the very systems that it should maintain.

This mode of thinking is clearly reflected in his attitude towards NATO. His past threats to not defend his "delinquent" allies that do not "pay" are not mere rhetoric, but at the heart of his transactional worldview. His current demands on NATO members to spend 5% of their GDP on defense costs suggest that he sees the crisis as an opportunity for negotiations to impose new payment terms on allies 6. Therefore, Article 4 consultation is not a place for him to fulfill his legal obligations, but an opportunity to make a call to collect the debt.

2.3. Trends from Aides: Spectrum of Loyalty and Damage Control

President Trump's decisions are influenced by his close aides, but his influence depends on individual loyalty and his ability to manage the president's impulses.

• Secretary of State Marco Rubio: He takes on the role of a traditional realist. His statement, which accused Russian drone invasion as "unacceptable" but withheld judgment on its intent, is analyzed as calculated damage control to leave the president with a diplomatic option and avoid immediate escalation.

• Mike Waltz, Presidential Assistant to National Security Affairs: He is positioned as a pragmatic "America First." His focus is on negotiated conflict termination and the shift in security burdens to Europe, where he is likely to support policies that avoid direct US military intervention and prioritize economic measures.13

• Secretary of Defense Pete Hegses: He is an ideological hard-liner. His move to rename the Pentagon to the "master of war" by professing that the US military will not remain in Europe "forever" is pointing to the intention of radically destroying the post-World War Consensus 1. His opinion will amplify President Trump's most isolated impulses.

These different positions may appear to suggest policy conflicts within the administration. However, a deeper analysis reveals that it functions as an unintended "good/bad cop" strategy. Secretary of State Rubio's careful remarks provide minimal guarantees to prevent the alliance from falling completely apart. Meanwhile, the hard-hitting threats from President Trump himself and Defense Secretary Hegses create the utmost pressure to force allies to make concessions. This dual communication paralyses the consistent response of the European side, forcing individual countries to weigh the risk of resistance against the costs of concessions. This dynamic allows the administration to maintain a certain degree of "plausible denial" while pursuing a fundamental policy shift.

Chapter 3: Main scenarios for the response of the US (Trump administration) (0–30 days)

3.1. Scenario 1 (High probability: 65–75%): Transactional pivot

• overview: The United States will formally accept Article 4 consultations, but will refuse to send troops to the "Operation Eastern Sentinel." President Trump will immediately turn the crisis into a public negotiation venue, linking any future US support through social media to two core demands: (1) All NATO member states suspend purchases of Russian oil, (2) NATO as a whole imposes significant tariffs on China 8. The US response is not a counter-money to Russia's acts of aggression, but rather a slogan of whether allies will pledge their loyalty to President Trump himself and his agenda.

• 主要指標: President Trump's social media post 8, the official absence of the US on the list of participating countries in Operation Eastern Sentinel 3, and the statements of senior administration officials focusing on economic measures rather than military deterrence.

• 影響: It creates serious cracks within NATO. Poland and the Baltic States feel abandoned, and Germany and France resist linking it to China's policy. Russia is gaining momentum in the face of visible alliance discrepancies.

3.2. Scenario 2 (Medium probability: 15–25%): Isolation due to "America First"

• overview: This is triggered when Europe publicly and uniformly rejects President Trump's transactional demands. President Trump dramatically escalates his rhetoric, publicly questioning the credibility of the threat to Poland, praises Putin's "strength," openly threatens the withdrawal of Western troops 16 and raises doubts about his commitment to Article 5 by repeating his past statements that he would not defend his "delinquent" allies. This is the manifestation of the "retaliation" stage of his psychological cycle 1.

• 主要指標: The G7 or major EU leaders publicly condemn President Trump's demands as "blackmail." President Trump will hold a campaign rally to attack NATO. The Department of Defense is ordered to formulate a plan to withdraw US troops from Germany.

• 影響: This is a life-threatening crisis for NATO. The reliability of US security guarantees will evaporate, significantly increasing the risk of a disorderly, uncooperative rearmament race in Europe and a military miscalculation by Russia.

3.3. Scenario 3 (Low probability: 5–15%): Hawkish pretend

• overview: Given strong pressure from hawkish in Congress (such as Senator Lindsey Gram and Representative Joe Wilson) and the desire to project an image of strength, the administration announces its symbolic US contribution to the "Operation Eastern Sentinel" 20. This will be minimal and highly popular, including the short-term deployment of F-22 fighter jets to Poland and the dispatch of US military officers to Operations Command. However, this support is clearly conditional and limited-time, accompanied by a presidential statement that it is a "once this time, until the allies pay their bills."

• 主要指標: An official press release announcing the Department of Defense's limited and nominal contribution to the operation, and a social media post from President Trump, who has watered down his commitment and repeatedly made financial demands shortly afterwards.

• 影響: It temporarily concedes the most hawkish forces of Washington and Warsaw, but is unable to resolve the underlying crises of trust. Russia sees it as a sign of weakness and internal cleavage in the United States.

The most important variable that determines the outcome of this crisis is not Russia's next action, but the initial response of Europe. The first Russian drone attack was merely a trigger. As modeled in Chapter 2, President Trump's decision-making process is inward-looking, with the aim of strengthening his self-image as a strong leader, primarily his domestic supporter as a primary audience. The transition from Scenario 1 to more extreme Scenario 2 is therefore triggered by the European reaction to President Trump's initial demands, not by further provocation by Russia. The public rejection by a major European leader (for example, the German Prime Minister) would be seen as a challenge to his personal authority. This personal insult, not a change in Poland's military situation, is the trigger for escalating anti-NATO rhetoric and action as a punitive measure to show his supporters not succumbing to his "disrespectful" "free-ride" allies. This dynamic makes Europe's public diplomatic stance in the first 72 hours after the crisis a major factor in crisis management.

Chapter 4: Analysis of the impacts in multiple areas

4.1. Alliance Unity: The Shield Crack

The US response will function as a united political and military alliance. The emergence of the European-led initiative, Operation Eastern Sentinel, is documented as the first concrete step towards a European security architecture without the US22. This creates serious strategic 불안. This is because Europe's military capabilities are insufficient to replace the backing of US security. The cost will be enormous 25. This analysis confirms the potential for a "collision course" and fundamental disconnection in Atlantic relations, which have been predicted by think tanks such as CSIS and the Brookings Institute.26

President Trump's publicly declared goal is to have Europe pay for its own defense spending, based on the assumption that it will create a stronger, more independent Europe while reducing costs to the US. However, the reality suggests that the data is the opposite. The "Operation Eastern Sentinel" was not born out of a partnership, but from a panic response to fill the void left by the United States that suddenly became unreliable.23 This new, fragmented security architecture lacks the critical integration of command and control, depth of logistics, and, above all, nuclear deterrent, the United States can offer. Russia is far more likely to miscalculate its determination against pure European defence than a US-led alliance. Therefore, rather than bringing about a stable and powerful Europe, President Trump's policy of "passing on the burden" would generally raise the risk of large-scale conflicts that could lead to nervous, incomprehensible, more vulnerable Europe, and ultimately involve the United States in much worse circumstances.

4.2. American politics: A collection of support bases

The most likely scenario (trade pivot) is a pure positive for President Trump domestically. This response will allow him to "facing" his allies to "strengthen" his support base, avoid the political risks of a new military conflict, and strengthen his core "America First" brand.

This dynamic will be linked to his approval ratings, 28 and framing of the crisis in conservative media.30 Conservative media likely portrays European appeals of solidarity as an attempt by the "globalist elite" to drag the United States into a new foreign war. The division between the hawkish 21 and isolationists within the Republican Party is a dynamic that President Trump can masterfully manage, satisfying the latter, but not entirely against the former.

4.3. Moscow and Beijing's perspective: a strategic windfall

Russia and China will interpret and use this crisis for their own interests. For Russia, US inaction proves the legitimacy of its long-term strategy of splitting NATO from within. This indicates that the thresholds that trigger a unified, powerful NATO response are much higher than previously assumed.

For China, the crisis is a strategic gift. It distracts the US attention, creates a deep and lasting rift between the US and its major European partners, undermining the possibility of creating a unified Atlantic Front over China's economic practices. Ironically, this is the exact opposite of what President Trump's transactional demands advocate for achieving. China's practical shift in line with the use of geopolitical friction for its long-term benefits from its blocked Polish border route to an alternative route, indicating its high adaptation capabilities.22

Chapter 5: Strategic Recommendations and Policy Options

5.1. Short-term Essentials (0–14 days): Managing Messages and Mitigating Damage

• diplomatic:

  • Option 1A (recommended): Affinity and redefine. Avoid publicly denying President Trump's demands. Instead, the European leaders publicly announce "a new high-level Atlantic dialogue on security and trade fairness," giving President Trump a public relations victory that will appeal to his support base. This will mitigate any immediate conflict.

  • Option 1B (high risk): collective rejection. We are releasing the link between security and trade as opposed to the spirit of the Washington Treaty. This is a principled position, but it almost certainly induces scenario 2 (isolation).

• 軍事:

  • Action 2A (required): Acceleration of "Operation Touhou Sentinel." It will immediately deploy additional European air defense assets (fighter jets, surface-to-air missiles, ISR platforms) into the operation. To demonstrate seriousness and capabilities, a Unified European Army Headquarters for operations will be established in Poland.

• information:

  • Action 3A (required): Strategic Narrative Campaign. For pro-NATO Republicans and conservative commentators, it will create and distribute a tone of conversation for the ultimate "America-first" policy (e.g. "Containing Putin at European costs").21. This is an attempt to influence President Trump through his own media ecosystem.

  • Draft narrative (for the US):

    • (Tweet format): "The powerful @NATO is the first line of defense for the United States. As Polish allies stand up to Putin, they save trillions of dollars on US taxpayers and prevent a bigger war. This is a great deal for the United States."

    • (Statement format): "We welcome President Trump's call for a fair share of burdens. That's why European allies are leading and funding the "Operation Eastern Sentinel" to ensure US interests in stable Europe, as a direct response to Russia's invasion."

5.2. Medium-term strategy (15-90 days): Building resilience in a world without guarantees

• diplomatic:

  • Action 1A (required): Enacting bilateral and minority security agreements. It will deepen security cooperation, particularly the UK, France, Poland, and the Baltic States, outside of the formal NATO decision-making structure.

• 軍事:

  • Action 2A (required): European Defense Industry Agreement. To fill the gap left by the US, it launches an urgent EU/NATO initiative that pools resources for joint procurement of critical capabilities, particularly integrated air defense missile defense, long-range precision firepower, and ISR drones.

• economy:

  • Action 3A (as appropriate): Preparing for retaliation tariffs. The EU must informally prepare a targeted retaliatory tariff list for politically sensitive US exports as a reliable deterrent against possible trade wars.

5.3. Reverse calculation of the worst-case scenario (contingency plan for scenario 2)

• Purpose: It will maintain a functional European security architecture and ensure a military back-channel with Washington, even if the US withdraws politically from NATO commitments.

• 行動:

  • Immediately establish a direct line of communication between the European Command (e.g. JFC Brunsum) and the US Department of Defense (JFC) that circumvent political levels, such as the White House and the National Security Council (NSC).

  • France and the UK must issue a joint statement expanding their nuclear security umbrella, particularly to Poland and the Baltic States, to fill the deterrent void for the time being.

  • It will convene an emergency EU summit to invoke a large-scale Permanent Military Cooperation (PESCO), focusing on the creation of a European-led operational headquarters.

Chapter 6: Appendix

6.1. KPI & EWI Monitoring Dashboard

The dashboard provides data-driven tools to track metrics predicting the trajectory of the US response in real time, allowing for proactive policy adjustments rather than passive crisis response. President Trump's decisions are extremely sensitive to his personal perceptions and the media environment. In this context, traditional information indicators (eg, military response level) are lagging indicators. This dashboard focuses on leading indicators of his intentions: his rhetoric, his political ecosystem responses, and the actions of his key aides. By monitoring these, we can warn you as early as possible about the transition from a baseline "transactional" scenario to a worst case "isolation" scenario.

6.2. Risk and Impact Matrix

This matrix provides a clear and prioritized overview of the most critical risks, allowing decision makers to focus their resources on the most likely and most impactful contingencies.

6.3. Major US military units under the European Army (EUCOM)

This table is a quick reference table of specific US military assets available within the region, highlighting the capabilities the US would withhold in the most likely scenario.

Cited literature

1. Trump's "Justice" Narrative and Risk Assessment

2. Emergency Briefing on Drone Incursion into Poland: What's In Blue..., Accessed September 17, 2025, https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/whatsinblue/2025/09/emergency-briefing-on-drone-incursion-into-poland.php

3. Accessed NATO Scrambles Fighter in Newest Response to Russian Drones, September 17, 2025, https://www.airandspaceforces.com/nato-scrambles-first-fighter-mission-response-operation-russian-drone-threat/

4. Fact-checking Trump's comments urging Russia to invade 'delinquent' NATO members, September 17, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-trumps-comments-urging-russia-to-invade-delinquent-nato-members

5. Impatient and Distracted: The United States and NATO Under Trump, September 17, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/councilofcouncils/global-memos/impatient-and-distracted-united-states-and-nato-under-trump

6. Accessed How Trump Could Productively Reshape the Transatlantic Defense Relationship, September 17, 2025, https://www.gmfus.org/news/how-trump-could-productively-reshape-transatlantic-defense-relationship

7. Trump's Five Percent Doctrine and NATO Defense Spending | PIIE, September 17, 2025, https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/2025/trumps-five-percent-doctrine-and-nato-defense-spending

8. Accessed Trump demands NATO action on Russian oil before any U.S. sanctions, September 17, 2025, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/09/13/trump-putin-russia-sanctions/

9. Trump calls on all NATO countries to stop buying Russian oil, threatens 50% to 100% tariffs on China, September 17, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-ukraine-oil-tariffs-nato-f8ca988188dceacb509ca40661ec3eb0

10. U.S.'s Rubio says Russian drone flight over Poland 'unaacceptable' \- TVP World, September 17, 2025, https://tvpworld.com/88910638/us-secretary-of-state-rubio-calls-russian-drone-incursion-into-poland-unacceptable

11. Rubio calls Russian drones over Poland 'unaacceptable' but declines to say it was intentional, accessed September 17, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/13/poland-russia-drones-rubio

12. Accessed US secretary of state doubts Russia deliberately targeted Poland with its drones, September 17, 2025, https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2025/09/14/7530786/

13. National security advisor says Putin, Zelenskyy agree 'only President Trump could get them to the table' \- Fox News, September 17, 2025, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/national-security-advisor-says-putin-zelenskyy-agree-only-president-trump-could-get-them-to-table

14. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz Remarks to the Press, September 17, 2025, https://www.state.gov/secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-and-national-security-advisor-mike-waltz-remarks-to-the-press

15. US national security advisor again rules out NATO membership for Ukraine after Zelenskyy offer \- Anadolu Ajansı, September 17, 2025, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/us-national-security-advisor-again-rules-out-nato-membership-for-ukraine-after-zelenskyy-offer/3491965

16. Pete Hegseth LIVE: 'American Troops Can't...'; U.S. Defense Secy's Big Announcement In Poland \- YouTube, September 17, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLWtxrU0NeE

17. Trump urges NATO countries stop buying Russian oil before US sanctions \- Al Jazeera, September 17, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/13/trump-urges-nato-countries-to-halt-russia-oil-purchases-before-us-sanctions

18. Russian drones in Poland: Nato takes action after airspace breach; launches 'Eastern Sentry', September 17, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/europe/russian-drones-in-poland-nato-takes-action-after-airspace-breach-launches-eastern-sentry/articleshow/123864604.cms

19. Russian drone incursions prompt NATO to initiate new military activity on its Eastern flank, September 17, 2025, https://defensescoop.com/2025/09/12/nato-eastern-sentry-russian-drone-incursions-poland/

20. Accessed Chairman Mast Issues Statement on Russia Violating Polish Airspace, September 17, 2025, https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/news/press-releases/chairman-mast-issues-statement-on-russia-violating-polish-airspace

21. GOP rep says Putin 'sticking his thumb in the eye of NATO' \- Yahoo News NZ, September 17, 2025, https://nz.news.yahoo.com/gop-rep-says-putin-sticking-201710060.html

22. Polish border closure and geopolitical impact analysis

23. NATO launches “Eastern Sentry” to bolster posture along Eastern flank, September 17, 2025, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news\_237601.htm

24. Eastern Sentry to enhance NATO's presence along its Eastern flank \- nato shape, accessed September 17, 2025, https://shape.nato.int/news-releases/eastern-sentry-to-enhance-natos-presence-along-its-eastern-flank

25. Defending Europe without the US: first estimates of what is needed \- Bruegel, September 17, 2025, https://www.bruegel.org/analysis/defending-europe-without-us-first-estimates-what-needed

26. Accessed The Transatlantic Alliance in the Age of Trump: The Coming Collisions \- CSIS, September 17, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/transatlantic-alliance-age-trump-coming-collisions

27. Beyond the NATO summit, key questions remain for European security | Brookings, September 17, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/beyond-the-nato-summit-key-questions-remain-for-european-security/

28. Trump's job approval and views of his personal traits \- Pew Research Center, September 17, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/08/14/trumps-job-approval-and-views-of-his-personal-traits/

29. President Trump's Approval Rating Hits New High \- The White House, September 17, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/09/president-trumps-approval-rating-hits-new-high/

30. Accessed A test for NATO — and for Trump, September 17, 2025, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/09/12/trump-nato-poland-russia-drones/

31. What to know about NATO's Article 4 as Poland downs Russian drones \- YouTube, September 17, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YDN45wea94

32. Accessed Graham Applauds Trump's Speech in Poland \- Press Releases, September 17, 2025, https://www.lgraham.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2017/7/graham-applauds-trump-s-speech-in-poland